IRIS's cloud payroll, priced by payslip volume rather than by employee
223 reviews matching your filters
Emma Ashworth
Sole trader · 1-10 employees · Hospitality
26 Jul 2026
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period, and the API let our developers embed payroll into our own system. No complaints so far.
Pros
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.
Cons
They hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.
Ian Kowalski
Practice manager · 11-50 employees · Healthcare
14 Jul 2026
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period. It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Pros
RTI submissions go through cleanly every period.
Cons
It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.
Sophie Halliwell
Bookkeeper · 1-10 employees · Property and lettings
13 Jul 2026
Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools, and the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll. Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable, which is about the only positive.
Pros
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.
Cons
Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.
Priya Devlin
Owner · 1-10 employees · Property and lettings
12 Jul 2026
Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly, and it scaled with us without a change of platform. It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally, but we live with it.
Pros
Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.
Cons
It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.
Ian Iqbal
Head of payroll · 501-1000 employees · Hospitality
26 Jun 2026
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll, and some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools. Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly, which is about the only positive.
Pros
Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.
Cons
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
Adam Lockhart
Company secretary · 201-500 employees · Food and beverage
24 Jun 2026
Mixed. The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system, but the payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
Pros
The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.
Cons
The payslip model can cost more for a stable high headcount payroll.
Jodie Ainsley
Financial controller · 51-200 employees · Logistics and transport
12 Jun 2026
It scaled with us without a change of platform. Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.
Pros
It scaled with us without a change of platform.
Cons
It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.
Stephen Wexford
Payroll manager · 51-200 employees · Wholesale
10 Jun 2026
The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system, and being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. No complaints so far.
Pros
The API let our developers embed payroll into our own system.
Cons
It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.
Sophie Baptiste
Management accountant · 201-500 employees · Food and beverage
10 Jun 2026
Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly, and RTI submissions go through cleanly every period. No complaints so far.
Pros
Paying by payslip volume suits our seasonal headcount perfectly.
Cons
It is newer than the incumbents and you notice occasionally.
Rebecca Middleton
Bookkeeper · 1-10 employees · Hospitality
9 Jun 2026
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable. That said, some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools and they hid the detailed pricing behind a demo form this year.
Pros
Being part of IRIS means the compliance backbone is dependable.
Cons
Some older IRIS features still live in the desktop tools.