
Sage 50 Accounts
Starting price
£115/mo
- Free Trialyes
- Free Versionno
of reviewers rated it 4 stars or above

Cloud financial management for finance teams that have outgrown small business accounting
Sage Intacct is what Sage sells to a finance function rather than to a business owner. The dividing line is roughly twenty employees and a finance team that has a qualified accountant in it. If your month end involves consolidating entities, allocating across departments and projects, and explaining variances to a board, this is the part of the Sage range built for that work.
Dimensional accounting is the reason people choose it. Rather than building an unwieldy nominal code structure to capture department, location, project, fund and customer, Intacct tags transactions with dimensions and lets you report across any combination afterwards. Anyone who has maintained a four segment code structure in an older ledger will understand immediately why this matters.
Multi entity consolidation is genuinely strong. Intercompany transactions, multiple currencies and different reporting calendars are handled as core functionality rather than as a bolt on, and consolidations that took days in a spreadsheet run in minutes. For charities, professional services firms and groups with several trading companies, this is usually the deciding factor.
The reporting layer is the other draw. Real time dashboards that finance can build without calling a consultant, and a close process that can be genuinely shortened rather than just documented.
Sage does not publish a price, and that tells you what you need to know about the sales process. Expect a scoped quote, an implementation partner, and a total first year cost well into five figures once configuration and data migration are included. It is not a product you sign up for on a Tuesday afternoon.
It is also more finance platform than business suite. Manufacturing, deep inventory and field operations are not its natural territory, which is why Sage sells Operations for Sage Intacct alongside it. If your problem is the warehouse rather than the ledger, look at Sage 200 or X3 first.
Implementation quality varies enormously by partner. The software is consistent; the outcome depends heavily on who configures your dimensions and your chart of accounts at the start, and that decision is expensive to revisit later.
Intacct originated in the United States and the UK edition has been developed to suit local requirements, so check the specifics that apply to you during the demo rather than assuming parity with the US product. Confirm your VAT scheme, your MTD submission route and your consolidation requirements in writing before signing, and ask directly about UK support hours and where your data is held.
Organisations with twenty or more employees, a real finance team, and either multiple entities or reporting requirements that a small business ledger cannot express. If you are choosing between Intacct and staying on Sage 50, the question is whether you need dimensions and consolidation. If you do, nothing cheaper will solve it.

Sage Intacct
Custom pricing

Sage 50 Accounts
£115/mo
Overall rating
Based on 209 reviews
Starting from
Contact vendor
Excludes VAT unless stated · checked 5 Aug 2026
Products UK buyers shortlist alongside Sage Intacct.

Starting price
£115/mo
of reviewers rated it 4 stars or above

Starting price
£9/mo
of reviewers rated it 4 stars or above

Starting price
£14.33/mo
of reviewers rated it 4 stars or above

Starting price
£16/mo
of reviewers rated it 4 stars or above
The things UK buyers ask most about Sage Intacct, from pricing to compliance. Still stuck? The editorial team is one message away.
Contact usTypical company sizes, industries and job titles based on verified Assaylist reviews.
Ease of use
Based on 209 reviews
Based on 50 reviews
Based on 50 reviews
Based on 50 reviews
What verified reviewers consistently praise, and where they say it falls short.
Overall sentiment
Based on 209 reviews
Dimensions replaced a four segment nominal code structure we hated.
73% positive across 209 reviews
Andrew Marsden
Bookkeeper, 1-10 employees
“Dimensions replaced a four segment nominal code structure we hated.”
Some UK specifics needed configuring rather than working out of the box.
11% critical across 209 reviews
Mark Nowak
Operations manager, 51-200 employees
“Some UK specifics needed configuring rather than working out of the box.”
What the product does, as listed by the vendor and checked against the current release.
Features
Based on 209 reviews
Free Trial Available
Value for money
Based on 209 reviews
Contact vendor/mo
We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never affects our ratings or what we recommend. How this works.
The tools this product plugs into, as published by the vendor.
How you can reach the vendor, and where the product is sold.
Sold in
Languages
English
Customer service
Based on 209 reviews
Based on 209 reviews
Sorted by most recent
Robert Iqbal
Director · 11-50 employees · Professional services
4 Aug 2026
Intercompany transactions post correctly without manual journals, and dimensions replaced a four segment nominal code structure we hated. You need a good partner and they are not all good, but we live with it.
Pros
Intercompany transactions post correctly without manual journals.
Cons
You need a good partner and they are not all good.
Sarah Kowalski
Financial controller · 201-500 employees · Retail
3 Aug 2026
Intercompany transactions post correctly without manual journals. That said, you need a good partner and they are not all good and not the right tool if your complexity is in the warehouse.
Pros
Intercompany transactions post correctly without manual journals.
Cons
You need a good partner and they are not all good.
Helen Sandhu
Bookkeeper · 1-10 employees · IT services
3 Aug 2026
Project accounting gives us revenue recognition we can actually audit. Only real gripe is that some UK specifics needed configuring rather than working out of the box.
Pros
Project accounting gives us revenue recognition we can actually audit.
Cons
Some UK specifics needed configuring rather than working out of the box.